Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds Income-tax Officer's additions, disallows interest payments to partners in registered firm</h1> The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the Revenue in a case concerning the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the additions made by the ... Business Expenditure, Firm The High Court of Allahabad ruled in a case involving the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found in favor of the Revenue, stating that the additions made by the Income-tax Officer were legally correct. The Tribunal's decision to delete the additions was overturned. The case involved a registered firm with five partners, and the disallowed interest payments to two partners were upheld. The judgment was delivered by B. P. Jeevan Reddy C. J. and V. N. Mehrotra.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
