Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petition Dismissed Due to 523-Day Delay; Pending Applications Disposed Without Considering Petition Merits.</h1> The SC dismissed the petition owing to a delay of 523 days in filing the SLP, citing insufficient explanation for the delay. Consequently, all pending ... Delay in filling SLP - Deduction u/s 80-IB(10) and Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - non- deduction of TDS on provision for expenses - HC [2022 (11) TMI 1507 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] decided issue in favour of assessee - HELD THAT:- We see no reason to condone the inordinate delay of 523 days in filing the Special Leave Petition as the explanation sought to be provided, does not constitute sufficient cause. Hence, petition(s) stands dismissed on the ground of delay. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition due to a delay of 523 days in filing the Special Leave Petition, as the explanation provided was not sufficient. Pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
